The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into business processes opens new attack vectors that traditional IT security doesn't cover. Anyone running LLMs in production must understand the threat landscape — and in 2026, it's considerably more complex than just two years ago.
The OWASP Foundation has defined the Top 10 security risks for LLM applications — a must-read for every security team:
| Rank | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prompt Injection | Manipulation of model behavior through malicious inputs |
| 2 | Insecure Output Handling | Unfiltered model outputs lead to XSS, SSRF, code execution |
| 3 | Training Data Poisoning | Manipulated training data compromises model behavior |
| 4 | Model Denial of Service | Overload through resource-intensive prompts |
| 5 | Supply Chain Vulnerabilities | Compromised models, plugins, or data pipelines |
| 6 | Sensitive Information Disclosure | Model reveals confidential training data |
| 7 | Insecure Plugin Design | Insecure tool calls and API integrations |
| 8 | Excessive Agency | Too many permissions for autonomous AI agents |
| 9 | Overreliance | Blind trust in model outputs without validation |
| 10 | Model Theft | Extraction of model weights or proprietary knowledge |
The attacker enters directly malicious instructions into the input field:
The attack comes not from the user, but from external data sources the model processes:
Critical: Indirect prompt injection is particularly dangerous because the attack is invisible to the user and the data source appears trustworthy.
LLMs can be abused as a channel for data leaks:
Bottom line: AI security is not an optional feature — it's a fundamental prerequisite for productive LLM deployment. Without understanding the threat landscape, every protective measure is guesswork.
Welche Art von Prompt Injection ist besonders gefährlich, weil sie für den Nutzer unsichtbar ist?